Originally posted by BusAnalayzer:Bro.. SMRT has become unreliable for both trunks as well as feeders. Can give you a list of services that have bad frequency, skipping bus stops, late.
For sv 161, a lot of people will vouch here, how this service looked a couple of years back and today. It is not just full fleet DDs but also DDs have been added. The morning peak frequency is 08-10 mins and each bus carries 60-80 pax - comfortable journey for everyone taking the bus. I see you keep harping on how sv 161 is bad - but if you see the improvement this service has got, no SMRT service has.
So I suggest you stop all your biased posts on SMRT love, because they just don't make logical sense. You will only get flamed because none of your points make sense to the larger audience here.
"That's why I've said, the unreliable part of SMRT and the contributing ones are mostly from the trunks.. vice versa for SBS Transit."
MOSTLY from the trunks =/= feeders don't contribute.
Woah~ Oh please, I'm just mentioning the same problem on SBS Transit with SMRT, how is that bias? You should know how bad some SBS Transit service are, and some even worst than SMRT. How come nobody mention it? Another bias?
You want improvement, I can give u some. SMRT ones are rather minor improvements, plus with the company fianance and ability, they can't fork out a bigger improvements yet.
But being in a bigger company, 161 can get improvements but they simply limit themselves. Why can't they add a few more buses? That's just an example from me. Another would be svc86. At AMK, it seems that the frequency is okay, but out to the road, waiting for 1 86 can be longer than some other service(and it's interchange's frequency), and it's off peak hours.
SBS Transit have the buses, but they deploy some to useless services. How is that effective? [Talking about higher capacity buses]